Key result
New use of β-blockers after AMI in older nursing home residents was associated with increased odds of hospitalization for hypotension (OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.03-1.39) and breathlessness.
Why the study?
Does new use of β-blockers increase adverse events in frail older nursing home residents after acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=10,992)
Yes
Does new use of β-blockers increase adverse events in frail older nursing home residents after acute myocardial infarction?
Odds Ratio: 1.2 (95% CI 1.03–1.39)
In frail older nursing home residents post-AMI, new use of β-blockers is associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for hypotension and breathlessness, suggesting caution in prescribing for this vulnerable group.
May warrant caution prescribing β-blockers to frail NH residents post-AMI; leaves open net benefit in this population.
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the burden of adverse events caused by β-blocker use after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in frail, older nursing home (NH) residents. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used national Medicare claims linked to Minimum Data Set assessments. The study population was individuals aged ≥65 years who resided in a U.S. NH for ≥30 days, had a hospitalized AMI between May 2007 and March 2010, and returned to the NH. Exposure was new use of β-blockers versus nonuse post-AMI. Orthostasis, general hypotension, falls, dizziness, syncope, and breathlessness outcomes were measured over 90 days of follow-up. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes were estimated using multinomial logistic regression models after 1:1 propensity score-matching of β-blocker users to nonusers. RESULTS: Among the 10,992 NH propensity score-matched residents with an AMI, the mean age was 84 years and 70.9% were female. β-blocker users were more likely than nonusers to be hospitalized for hypotension (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.39) or experience breathlessness (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.20) after AMI. With the exception of falls, other outcome estimates, though imprecise, were compatible with a potential elevated risk of orthostasis (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.96-1.35), syncope, (OR = 1.24, 95% CI 0.55-2.77), and dizziness (OR = 1.28, 95% CI 0.82-1.99) among β-blocker users. CONCLUSIONS: Considered alongside prior evidence that β-blockers may worsen functional outcomes in NH residents with poor baseline functional and cognitive status, our results suggest that providers should exercise caution when prescribing for these vulnerable groups, balancing the mortality benefit against the potential for causing adverse events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zullo et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction (n=10,992). β-blockers vs. nonuse was evaluated on Hospitalization for hypotension (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.39). New use of β-blockers after AMI in older nursing home residents was associated with increased odds of hospitalization for hypotension (OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.03-1.39) and breathlessness.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: