Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analyzes the activity of chimeric mutants in protease inhibition, suggesting conformational independence in binding.
Three chimeric mutants of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) have been constructed where the strained loop of wild type PAI-1 (wtPAI-1) has been replaced with a 19-amino acid region from either plasminogen activator inhibitor 2 (PAI-2), antithrombin III, or with an artificial serine protease inhibitor superfamily consensus strained loop. The inhibitors were expressed in Escherichia coli, and the purified proteins had specific activities toward urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) or the single- and two-chain forms of tissue type plasminogen activator (tPA) that were similar to wtPAI-1. Experiments suggest that the strained loop of PAI-1 is not responsible for the transition between the latent and the active conformations or for binding to vitronectin. Second-order rate constants for the interactions with uPA and single- or two-chain tPA were similar to those of wtPAI-1. Values range from a low of 1.8 x 10(5) M-1 s-1 for the interaction of the PAI-2 chimera with single-chain tPA to a high value of 1.6 x 10(7) M-1 s-1 for the consensus mutant with two-chain tPA. This former value is 200 times higher than the reported rate constant for the interaction between PAI-2 and single-chain tPA, suggesting that structures outside of the strained loop are responsible for the major differences in specificity between PAI-1 and PAI-2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lawrence et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: