Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIM: To measure choroidal thickness in the cross-sectional images of myopic patients using different correction methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Examination included 162 patients (324 eyes) aged 9 to 19 years (mean: 11.6 ± 2.7 years), with myopia between 0.5 D to 11.75 D (mean: 4.0 ± 2.3 D) using different myopia correction methods, e.g., monofocal spectacles (MF): 96 eyes, Group 1), perifocal spectacles (40 eyes, Group 2), orthokeratology lenses (OKL) (36 eyes, group 3), bifocal soft contact lenses (BSCL) (86 eyes, Group 4), and Stellest® spectacles (66 eyes, Group 5). The anterior-posterior axis and subfoveal choroidal thickness (non-cycloplegic), and cycloplegic autorefraction were measured in all patients. RESULTS: In general, choroidal thickness (CT) and CT to the anterior-posterior axis (CT/APA) ratios were 328.6 ± 15.6 μm and 12.9 ± 0.6 in OKL wearers, 298.8 ± 9.4 μm and 12.2 ± 0.4 in Stellest® wearers, 267.4 ± 8.3 μm and 10.8 ± 0.3 in BSCL wearers, and 264.6 ± 12.4 μm and 10.4 ± 0.5 in perifocal spectacles wearers, respectively. The lowest CT and CT/APA ratios were in the monofocal group (241.9 ± 5.3 μm and 9.5 ± 0.2, respectively). The difference in these parameters between the monofocal and other groups was statistically significant (р 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study of the cross-sectional images convincingly demonstrates significantly greater choroidal thickness in myopic patients using optical correction methods imposing myopic defocus on the retinal periphery, compared to monofocal spectacles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Тарутта et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: