What does this research mean for the field?

In aphasia implementation research, organizational-level determinants are frequently identified but system-level determinants and outcomes are rarely evaluated, underscoring the need for standardized frameworks to address broader barriers to care. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.SYNTHESIS. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

What question did this study set out to answer?

This study identifies the organizational and system-level barriers and facilitators impacting the implementation of best practices in aphasia care.

July 21, 2026Aphasiology

Global collaborations in aphasia care need a common language: secondary analysis of organizational and system-level barriers and facilitators to the implementation of best practices

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

MHMarie‐Christine HalléUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières CTCarla Tierney‐HendricksHarvard University MSMegan E. SchliepMGH Institute of Health Professions

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Secondary analysis identifies barriers and facilitators in aphasia care implementation science, suggesting improvements for global practices.

Key Points

This study identifies the organizational and system-level barriers and facilitators impacting the implementation of best practices in aphasia care.
Conducted a secondary analysis of the most comprehensive scoping review in communication sciences.
Included publications specifically related to aphasia rehabilitation.
Mapped barriers and facilitators to the CFIR framework, categorizing implementation strategies and outcomes.
Fifteen studies were included, revealing organization-level determinants in all studies related to CFIR constructs.
Only 13.3% of studies documented system-level determinants, which correlated with external pressures.
Implementation strategies were tested in 73.3% of studies, primarily focusing on training and education.

Cite This Study

Hallé et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a62e0179a2e487662c1abbd https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2026.2703137

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Secondary analysis identifies barriers and facilitators in aphasia care implementation science, suggesting improvements for global practices.

Global collaborations in aphasia care need a common language: secondary analysis of organizational and system-level barriers and facilitators to the implementation of best practices

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Global collaborations in aphasia care need a common language: secondary analysis of organizational and system-level barriers and facilitators to the implementation of best practices

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider