Key result
A physical activity enhancing program significantly increased physical activity levels by 961.37 MET/min/w compared to usual care in elderly patients 6 weeks after discharge for hip fracture surgery.
Why the study?
Does a physical activity enhancing program improve the level of physical activity in elderly patients after surgical treatment of hip fracture?
RCT (n=46)
Simple block randomization
No
Does a physical activity enhancing program improve the level of physical activity in elderly patients after surgical treatment of hip fracture?
Mean Difference: 961.37
Absolute Event Rate: 1738.24% vs 776.87%
p-value: p=<0.01
A structured physical activity enhancing program significantly improves physical activity levels in elderly patients recovering from hip fracture surgery compared to standard care.
PEP improves post-hip fracture physical activity; extends self-efficacy rehab evidence in elderly patients.
Background: Hip fracture seriously influences an elderly person’s life and mobility, independent living, and causes earlier mortality. Although surgery is generally successful, many of the elderly suffer from decreased physical ability after surgery for hip fracture. Objectives: To determine the effects of a physical activity enhancing program (PEP) on the level of physical activity of elderly patients after surgical treatment of hip fracture. Methods: A randomized controlled trial of 46 elderly patients was conducted at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital from January 2012 to February 2013 to evaluate the effectiveness of the Resnick self-efficacy model (2009) compared with standard care in improving physical activity. The participants were enrolled on a criteria basis and were block randomized into two groups. The intervention group attended four phases of physical training and efficacy based intervention comprising assessment, preparation, practicing, and evaluation phases with face-to-face contact and five telephone calls during seven weeks post-surgery. Results: Six weeks after discharge, the physical activity of the intervention group increased by significantly more than the control group (F 1,43 = 9.63, P < 0.01), with an effect size of 0.18 after controlling for preoperative physical activity. The ratio of the effect on physical activity induced by the PEP was higher than that induced by usual care (65.2% vs. 47.8%). Conclusion: PEP is effective at improving physical activity. Efforts to follow up for longer periods and with studies using larger populations are recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suwanpasu et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Hip fracture post-surgery (n=46). Physical activity enhancing program (PEP) vs. Usual standard care was evaluated on Physical activity level at 6 weeks post-discharge (MET/min/w) (MD 961.37, p=<0.01). A physical activity enhancing program significantly increased physical activity levels by 961.37 MET/min/w compared to usual care in elderly patients 6 weeks after discharge for hip fracture surgery.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: