Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We propose a method for estimating traffic volumes on all roads of the network, which is relevant to various traffic use cases. By combining large-scale probe-vehicle data with stationary detector data, this method builds a model to estimate the probe-vehicle penetration rate at road level, which then allows for traffic volume estimation. Trained by penetration rates from only 60% of the stationary detectors in the Netherlands, our model is able to predict the probe-vehicle penetration rate with a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 8.3%, which decreases to 6% on motorways. Increasing the proportion of detectors used for training did not significantly improve model performance. This suggests that our method can be used in countries with less-developed detector infrastructure as well, provided a minimum coverage of detectors is achieved for all regions and road classes of interest. Traffic volume estimation quality ( MAP E q ) is constrained by the quality of the penetration rate estimation ( MAP E p ) and the sampling error, denoted as MAP E n . Using the estimated penetration rates, traffic volumes on motorways can be estimated with a MAP E q of 25% within about 2 min of collecting probe-vehicle observations and 7% within a day. Thus, our traffic volume estimations can support real-time operations on motorways. For roads other than motorways, the maximum accuracy is limited to a MAP E q of about 12%, and significantly longer observation periods are needed. Still, most offline use cases can be covered (e.g., annual average daily traffic).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eisinga et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: