This article examines how political stability affects industrial capabilities and global value chain dynamics in Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, revealing key differences.
This article examines why Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, despite participating in the same buyer-driven apparel global value chain, have followed divergent upgrading trajectories. It develops a dual-track interaction framework to analyse how different forms of political stability shape the co-evolution of institutions and industrial capabilities. The central argument is that effective political stability is not merely a matter of regime continuity; rather, it depends on the state’s capacity to generate credible expectations, sustain policy commitments, and support sectoral co-ordination. Bangladesh’s apparel sector has achieved remarkable export growth and strong production capabilities, but surface-level political stability – at least until 2024 – combined with underlying polarisation, uneven enforcement, and patronage-based state–business relations has constrained functional upgrading. Sri Lanka, despite broader national volatility, developed a sector-specific consensus around apparel exports, more professionalised state–business co-ordination, and collective branding around quality and ethical production. These institutional conditions supported capability upgrading into higher-value niches. By linking political stability, state–business relations, and global value chain upgrading, the article offers a middle-range political economy explanation for divergent manufacturing trajectories in South Asia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: