Evaluates PET imaging effectiveness for c-Met in NSCLC, suggesting improved patient selection for treatments.
The c-Met receptor is a key therapeutic target in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Current methods for assessing c-Met level, are limited by biopsy sampling, which fails to account for spatio-temporal and intra-tumour heterogeneity. This study aims to evaluate the use of PET/CT imaging for non-invasive, full-body quantification of c-Met expression in different subtypes of NSCLC, encompassing both ADC and squamous cell carcinoma and compare it to MET gene alterations and IHC c-Met scoring. [ 68 Ga]Ga-EMP-100, a PET radiotracer targeting c-Met, was radiolabelled and characterized. Cell-Derived Xenograft (CDX) models of NSCLC with different characteristics were developed and validated for PET/CT imaging using [ 68 Ga]Ga-EMP-100. Tumour uptake and heterogeneity were quantified and compared to c-Met expression determined by IHC (H-score using SP44 and EP1454Y antibodies) and MET gene amplification detected by FISH and NGS. Automated radiolabelling of [ 68 Ga]Ga-EMP-100 demonstrated a high radiochemical yield (RCY) and purity (RP). Pharmacokinetics studies revealed rapid excretion predominantly by the renal pathway. PET/CT imaging resulted in high contrast and enabled non-invasive classification of CDX models regarding c-Met receptor levels. The highest tumour uptake was observed in H1648 and EBC-1 models. Although MET gene alterations were not correlated with c-Met protein expression at the cell surface, a good correlation was found between SUVmax and c-Met expression, when using the EP1454Y antibody. PET/CT imaging using [ 68 Ga]Ga-EMP-100 successfully quantified c-Met expression in vivo, clearly adding up to conventional IHC and genetic methods. Our study adds novel comparative evidence across tumour histotypes, providing new insight into how tumour phenotype affects c-Met–targeted imaging. This radiotracer holds potential as a non-invasive tool for selecting patients for c-Met-targeted therapies and monitoring therapeutic response in NSCLC. Further clinical studies are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rusu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: