Key result
Metabolically unhealthy status is linked to impaired global work efficiency, exacerbated by epicardial adipose tissue.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate subclinical cardiac dysfunction across distinct obesity phenotypes using myocardial work indices and investigate the moderating role of epicardial adipose tissue on myocardial work impairment.
Do different obesity phenotypes and metabolic health statuses impair myocardial work indices, and does epicardial adipose tissue volume moderate this impairment in adults without overt cardiac dysfunction?
Cross-Sectional (n=192)
No
Do different obesity phenotypes and metabolic health statuses impair myocardial work indices, and does epicardial adipose tissue volume moderate this impairment in adults without overt cardiac dysfunction?
Effect estimate: β = -2.964
p-value: p=<0.001
Myocardial work indices can detect subclinical cardiac dysfunction in metabolically unhealthy individuals before LVEF declines, with epicardial adipose tissue expansion exacerbating this mechanical impairment.
Metabolically unhealthy phenotypes were associated with impaired myocardial work efficiency; hypothesis-generating for epicardial adipose tissue moderation in subclinical dysfunction.
Objective To evaluate subclinical cardiac dysfunction across distinct obesity phenotypes using myocardial work (MW) indices, and to investigate the moderating role of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) on MW impairment. Methods One hundred ninety-two participants were categorized by BMI and metabolic status into four groups: metabolically healthy normal weight (MHNW), metabolically healthy obesity (MHO), metabolically unhealthy normal weight (MUNW), and metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUO). MW indices were measured using speckle-tracking echocardiography. EAT volume was quantified from ECG-gated CT scans. Associations were analyzed using ANCOVA and regression models. Results Despite no significant differences in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) among the groups, MUNW and MUO individuals exhibited significantly impaired MW, characterized by lower global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), and global work efficiency (GWE), alongside higher global waste work (GWW), compared with MHNW controls. MHO patients showed significantly better MW profiles than MUNW and MUO groups. EAT volume was increased in all obesity phenotype groups. Although no direct association was found between EAT volume and MW indices, EAT volume significantly moderated the relationship between Metabolically Unhealthy (MUH) and both GWE and GWW. Conclusions MW detects subclinical dysfunction earlier than LVEF across obesity phenotypes, with impairment progressively worsening from MHO to MUNW to MUO. In metabolically unhealthy individuals with increased EAT volume, more pronounced reductions in GWE and elevations in GWW were observed. Trial Rrgistration This study has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry under the registration number ChiCTR2500100754 (registration date: April 15, 2025).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Obesity phenotypes and subclinical cardiac dysfunction (n=192). Metabolically unhealthy status (MUH) vs. Metabolically healthy status was evaluated on Global Work Efficiency (GWE) (β = -2.964, p=<0.001). Metabolically unhealthy status was significantly associated with impaired global work efficiency (β = -2.964, P < 0.001), an effect that was significantly exacerbated by increased epicardial adipose tissue volume.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: