Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hybrid study assesses medication adherence and its impact on graft function in kidney transplant recipients, indicating critical implications for monitoring adherence.
Despite routine therapeutic drug monitoring after kidney transplantation, medication non-adherence often remains unrecognized until clinically relevant consequences become evident. This study aimed to assess medication adherence in kidney transplant recipients using self-reported measures and tacrolimus intra-patient variability (IPV), and to examine their association with graft function. This hybrid study combined a cross-sectional assessment of medication adherence with a prospective cohort follow-up. Tacrolimus trough concentrations, IPV, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were monitored over four consecutive routine visits (6–8 months). For each patient, eGFR was modelled as a function of time using simple linear regression, and the regression coefficient was used as the individual eGFR slope. Medication adherence was assessed using the BAASIS questionnaire. Associations between self-reported adherence, tacrolimus IPV (%CV), and graft function were analysed using the Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests. More than half of the participants (31 patients, 54.4%) reported non-adherence, predominantly related to dosing-time deviations rather than missed doses. These deviations were associated with increased tacrolimus intra-patient variability. Patients with higher tacrolimus variability had lower mean eGFR during follow-up, although no significant differences in longitudinal eGFR decline were observed. Increased tacrolimus IPV was associated with self-reported medication non-adherence, predominantly reflecting dosing-time deviations. Although these deviations did not result in a significantly faster decline in graft function during the 6–8-month follow-up, they increased tacrolimus variability, highlighting the importance of continued adherence monitoring to prevent greater variability and potential long-term adverse outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Catić‐Đorđević et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: