Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective study examines diagnostic criteria for catatonia and delirium in geriatric patients, highlighting the need for rigorous differential diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: The authors prospectively examined the relationship between catatonia and delirium in consecutive hospital admissions. Potentially confounding neuropsychiatric conditions for catatonia symptoms were also assessed. The Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98) and other tools were used to assess neuropsychiatric conditions. The BFCRS item relationships were analyzed with exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and correlation analyses. RESULTS: criteria, respectively, and significantly higher in the delirium group; no patient had catatonia per the RDCC. EFA identified three BFCRS factors, with immobility/stupor, mutism, and staring loading together onto the first factor. However, EFA explained only 48% of the variance, possibly attributable to catatonia symptom overlap with other conditions. EFA supported akinesia as a core catatonia feature. Many correlations between BFCRS items and scores for apathy, parkinsonism, dementia, depression, neuroleptic use, and drowsiness suggested confounding. Few correlations were observed between BFCRS and DRS-R-98 items, notably excitement with psychosis and motor agitation, as well as mitgehen with items representing the three core delirium domains and psychosis. CONCLUSIONS: criteria or the RDCC. The BFCRS criteria yielded a 10% catatonia rate, but BFCRS items were confounded by other conditions. Rigorous differential diagnosis of catatonia is needed among geriatric patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ochoa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: