Analyzes soil infiltration in urban rocky desertification areas, suggesting vegetation impacts infiltration processes.
Urban rocky desertification areas are characterized by shallow soils, rock–soil mosaics, and strong human disturbance, so infiltration processes may differ from those in homogeneous soils. However, interactions among multiple controlling factors remain insufficiently quantified. This study compared soil infiltration under artificially restored vegetation (planted grassland (PG) and planted woodland (PW)), and natural secondary vegetation (secondary grassland (SG) and secondary woodland (SW)). Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) and falling-head duration (T) were measured using falling-head tests on undisturbed soil columns. Soil physical properties were then integrated with partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to assess the effects of rocky desertification, soil aggregates, and porosity. Soil bulk density was significantly lower under artificially restored vegetation, whereas capillary porosity, non-capillary porosity, and water-holding capacity were significantly higher (p < 0.05). Infiltration performance followed PW > PG > SW > SG. PLS-SEM indicated that rocky desertification (−0.78), porosity (0.51), and aggregates (−0.03) jointly regulated infiltration, with non-capillary porosity as the dominant positive factor. Higher infiltration in artificially restored plots was mainly associated with improved pore structure. These findings support vegetation configuration and soil–water management in urban rocky desertification areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: