Randomized trial investigates soil nematode community changes in response to litter and understory removal, indicating ecological impacts.
Litter and understory are key components of forest ecosystems, playing vital roles in soil carbon inputs and microhabitat regulation. Their removal is a common forest management practice: litter removal (L) reduces fire and pest risks while promoting nutrient cycling, whereas understory removal (U) alleviates nutrient competition between understory plants and trees. However, the combined effects and underlying mechanisms of litter removal (L) and understory removal (U) on soil nematode communities remain unclear. This study investigated the individual and interactive effects of L and U on soil nematode communities in a coniferous–broadleaved mixed forest in a subtropical–warm temperate transition zone. The results showed that L significantly reduced soil nematode abundance by 18.1%, increased the relative abundance of bacterivores and omnivores-predators by 21.1% and 103.3%, respectively. U significantly elevated the relative abundance of fungivores by 30.8%, while both L and U reduced the relative abundance of plant-parasitic nematodes. Significant interactive effects between L and U were observed on soil nematode abundance, relative abundances of fungivores, plant-parasites, maturity index, and plant parasite index. Litter plus understory removal (LU) alleviated soil nematode resource limitation through synergistic regulation of resource pulses and microhabitat modification. Faunal analysis based on structure and enrichment indices indicated that LU enhanced food web structural complexity and resource-use efficiency. Redundancy analysis identified microbial biomass carbon, microbial biomass nitrogen, and soil total carbon as key drivers of nematode community differentiation. This study reveals the synergistic regulatory patterns of litter and understory vegetation on soil nematode communities, providing a theoretical reference for understanding the responses of soil nematodes to understory disturbance during the growing season in climate transitional forests, and offering basic data for long-term monitoring and forest soil management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xue et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: