Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Multicenter retrospective study finds interim PET response predicts survival in untreated CD5-positive DLBCL, suggesting treatment modifications may be necessary.
Background CD5-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive subtype with poor outcomes. Following the approval of Pola-R-CHP in China, this study aimed to evaluate its efficacy as initial therapy for this high-risk population.Methods We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study of previously untreated CD5-positive DLBCL patients who received Pola-R-CHP as first-line therapy between April 2023 and February 2025. Treatment response was assessed by PET/CT after 3 cycles and at the end of treatment.Results Among 32 enrolled patients (median age 63.5 years), 78.1% had stage III–IV disease and 59.4% had an International Prognostic Index score ≥3. The overall response rate (ORR) was 100% after 3 cycles, with a complete response rate (CRR) of 71.9%. At end of treatment, the ORR and CRR were 93.8% and 75%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 17.9 months, 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates (OS) were 70% and 82.7%. After adjusting covariates, failure to achieve a complete response (CR) after 3 cycles was a predictor of inferior survival [PFS HR: 18.1, p = 0.02; OS HR: 12.3, p = 0.033]. Grade 3–4 adverse events occurred in 31.3% of patients, with neutropenia being most common.Conclusions CD5-positive DLBCL patients exhibited rapid and promising responses to first-line Pola-R-CHP with an acceptable safety profile. Interim response assessment is a potential prognostic factor. In instances where CR is not attained by the interim PET/CT, it is advisable to consider treatment modification, as this may indicate a potential failure to achieve CR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sui et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: