Examines strategies to improve catalytic performance in CO oxidation using cerium and copper-based catalysts.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Designing sustainable catalysts requires maximizing atom efficiency while minimizing the use of critical raw materials. Driven by this challenge, the CuO x −CeO 2 active phase was constructed on morphology-controlled SrTiO 3 nanocubes using a low lanthanide loading (2, 4, and 8 Ce wt %). The catalysts were tested on the CO preferential oxidation in H 2 -rich streams (CO-PROX) and compared to a CuO/CeO 2 reference. Advanced STEM characterization in combination with H 2 -TPR analyses revealed that Cu-based species increase their dispersion with increasing ceria loadings, thereby enhancing CuO x −CeO 2 interfacial sites. This higher density of interfacial sites is associated with a larger population of Cu + active centers involved in CO oxidation, thereby enhancing catalytic performance. The optimized catalyst containing only 8 wt % Ce closely matches the conversion of CuO/CeO 2 up to 200 °C. However above this temperature the behavior diverges, accompanied by a significant decrease in activity. Further insight about the CuO x −CeO 2 interface and the formation of Cu + active sites promoted by increasing ceria loadings was obtained from XPS and DRIFTS measurements. These techniques suggest that the electronic state of ceria remains unaffected by the SrTiO 3 support, while subtle changes in selectivity may also be influenced, in addition to ceria loading, by the crystallographic nature of the lanthanide nanostructure. Furthermore, in situ and identical-location STEM experiments reveal that copper species dynamically redisperse under reducing conditions without compromising catalytic performance. This work demonstrates that catalytic performance can be tuned through the rational design of nanointerfaces, providing a route toward atom-efficient catalysts with reduced critical raw material incorporation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mora-Moreno et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: