Randomized trial examines motor unit discharge and fascicle length changes during muscle contractions, suggesting significant neuromechanical relationships.
The integration of high-density surface electromyography with ultrasound-transparent electrodes (HDEMG-US) and B-mode ultrasonography enables concurrent assessment of motor unit (MU) firing properties and fascicle length (FL) from the same muscle region. Although the isometric relations between MU discharge, FL, and torque have been characterised, their interactions during anisometric contractions remain poorly understood. This study examined MU discharge behaviour and its relation with FL changes during shortening and lengthening contractions of the tibialis anterior muscle. Ten healthy males performed isokinetic dorsiflexion contractions at a constant angular velocity of 2°/s while maintaining a constant submaximal torque of 25% maximum voluntary contraction torque, measured at a long muscle-tendon length (~30° of plantarflexion), with HDEMG-US signals and ultrasound images recorded simultaneously. MUs were identified using blind-source separation decomposition and FL was tracked with an optical flow algorithm. Cross-correlation analysis revealed high associations between cumulative spike train (CST), FL, and torque in both contraction phases. Neuromechanical delays were significantly longer during lengthening than shortening (phase effect: F (1, 7) = 8.51, P = 0.023; mean difference: −25.04 ms, 95% CI: −45.35 to −4.74). Discharge rate changed at a similar rate with variations in FL during both shortening and lengthening contractions (similar discharge rate–FL slopes, P = 0.44); however, absolute discharge rates were systematically lower during lengthening (difference in intercepts: P < 0.0001). These findings demonstrate the feasibility of HDEMG-US for characterising neuromechanical coupling during dynamic contractions and provide new evidence of neural drive regulation during shortening and lengthening muscle actions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arvanitidis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: