Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates the Y chromosome's potential for phylogenetic analysis, suggesting it improves accuracy in evolutionary studies.
The Y chromosome has been omitted from almost all phylogenomic analyses to date due to its complex structure, which makes accurate assembly and alignment across species challenging. Yet the Y chromosome is, in theory, an optimal phylogenetic marker. Y-chromosomal genes have a smaller effective population size than autosomal genes, reducing the likelihood of incomplete lineage sorting. Likewise, heterogametic hybrid offspring of different species are generally sterile, creating a barrier to Y-chromosomal gene flow. To overcome difficulties in using the Y chromosome, we developed a novel approach to identify orthologous Y-linked sequences in placental mammals, enabling us to generate a 63-species Y-chromosome alignment. We aligned ∼80 kilobases of predominantly non-coding sequence from conserved genes that are broadly expressed regulators of protein synthesis and spermatogenesis - the X-degenerate genes. Our phylogenetic reconstructions demonstrate that noncoding X-degenerate gene sequences recapitulate the same phylogeny derived from genome-wide noncoding, neutrally evolved sequences across the biparentally inherited autosomes and the X chromosome. We find strong support for the superordinal clades Euarchonta, Scrotifera, Fereuungulata, and Zooamata - groupings that have been historically considered controversial. Our results demonstrate that not only can the Y chromosome be aligned across species divergences spanning more than 100 million years, but it also performs robustly in a comparative phylogenetic context. We also present evidence that interchromosomal gene conversion between the non-recombining ZFX and ZFY genes has independently occurred in multiple lineages. ZFY has a proposed function as a meiotic executioner, and interchromosomal gene conversion may serve as a compensatory mechanism to prevent genetic decay of this essential gene.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexander et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: