Key result
Metformin did not significantly affect vascular tonometry measures over 36 months, while baseline cardiometabolic risk factors explained modest variance in reactive hyperaemia index (adjusted R2=0.11).
Why the study?
Beneficial vascular effects of metformin were reported in youth with type 1 diabetes, but its effects on peripheral arterial tonometry in adults at high cardiovascular risk remained unclear.
Does metformin improve peripheral arterial tonometry measures (RHI and AI) in adults with type 1 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk?
RCT (n=364)
Does metformin improve peripheral arterial tonometry measures (RHI and AI) in adults with type 1 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cardiometabolic factors explain limited PAT variance in high-risk T1D; leaves open metformin's vascular effects in adults.
Background Peripheral arterial tonometry (PAT) provides non-invasive measures of vascular health. Beneficial effects of metformin on vascular function have been reported in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D). In the REducing with MetfOrmin Vascular Adverse Lesions (REMOVAL) trial in adults with T1D and high cardiovascular risk, we examined: (i) the extent to which routinely-measured cardiometabolic risk factors explain variance in baseline PAT; and (ii) the effects of metformin on PAT measures. Methods Cross-sectional univariable and multivariable analyses of baseline reactive hyperaemia index (RHI) and augmentation index (AI) (EndoPAT® (Itamar, Israel); and analysis of 36-months metformin versus placebo on vascular tonometry. Results In 364 adults ((mean ± SD) age 55.2 ± 8.5 years, T1D 34.0 ± 10.6 years, HbA1c 64.5 ± 9.0 mmol/mol (8.1 ± 0.8%)), RHI was 2.26 ± 0.74 and AI was 15.9 ± 19.2%. In an exhaustive search, independent associates of (i) RHI were smoking, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure and vitamin B12 (adjusted R 2 = 0.11) and (ii) AI were male sex, pulse pressure, heart rate and waist circumference (adjusted R 2 = 0.31). Metformin did not significantly affect RHI or AI. Conclusion Cardiometabolic risk factors explained only a modest proportion of variance in PAT measures of vascular health in adults with T1D and high cardiovascular risk. PAT measures were not affected by metformin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Type 1 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk (n=364). Metformin vs. Placebo was evaluated on Reactive hyperaemia index (RHI) and augmentation index (AI). Metformin did not significantly affect vascular tonometry measures over 36 months, while baseline cardiometabolic risk factors explained modest variance in reactive hyperaemia index (adjusted R2=0.11).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: