Key result
A coronary artery calcium score > 40 was an independent predictor of atherosclerotic events in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes at low-to-intermediate cardiovascular risk (HR 27.11).
Why the study?
Does a coronary artery calcium score (CACS) > 40 improve the prediction of atherosclerotic events compared to the Framingham Risk Score in low-to-intermediate risk Chinese patients with Type 2 Diabetes?
Cohort (n=151)
Does a coronary artery calcium score (CACS) > 40 improve the prediction of atherosclerotic events compared to the Framingham Risk Score in low-to-intermediate risk Chinese patients with Type 2 Diabetes?
Hazard Ratio: 27.11 (95% CI 3.36–218.81)
p-value: p=0.002
In low-to-intermediate risk patients with Type 2 diabetes, a coronary artery calcium score > 40 strongly predicts future atherosclerotic events and outperforms traditional clinical risk scores.
CACS >40 independently predicts events in low-intermediate risk T2DM; leaves open whether it improves stratification or outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients are at increased risk of developing cardiovascular events. Unfortunately traditional risk assessment scores, including the Framingham Risk Score (FRS), have only modest accuracy in cardiovascular risk prediction in these patients. METHODS: We sought to determine the prognostic values of different non-invasive markers of atherosclerosis, including brachial artery endothelial function, carotid artery atheroma burden, ankle-brachial index, arterial stiffness and computed tomography coronary artery calcium score (CACS) in 151 T2DM Chinese patients that were identified low-intermediate risk from the FRS recalibrated for Chinese (<20% risk in 10 years). Patients were prospectively followed-up and presence of atherosclerotic events documented for a mean duration of 61 ± 16 months. RESULTS: A total of 17 atherosclerotic events in 16 patients (11%) occurred during the follow-up period. The mean FRS of the study population was 5.0 ± 4.6% and area under curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for prediction of atherosclerotic events was 0.59 ± 0.07 (P = 0.21). Among different vascular assessments, CACS > 40 had the best prognostic value (AUC 0.81 ± 0.06, P < 0.01) and offered significantly better accuracy in prediction compared with FRS (P = 0.038 for AUC comparisons). Combination of FRS with CACS or other surrogate vascular markers did not further improve the prognostic values over CACS alone. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified CACS > 40 as an independent predictor of atherosclerotic events in T2DM patients (Hazards Ratio 27.11, 95% Confidence Interval 3.36-218.81, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In T2DM patients identified as low-intermediate risk by the FRS, a raised CACS > 40 was an independent predictor for atherosclerotic events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lau et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (n=151). Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) > 40 vs. CACS ≤ 40 was evaluated on Atherosclerotic events (HR 27.11, 95% CI 3.36-218.81, p=0.002). A coronary artery calcium score > 40 was an independent predictor of atherosclerotic events in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes at low-to-intermediate cardiovascular risk (HR 27.11).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: