Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates classification efficiency in medical imaging, indicating optimal techniques vary by modality.
As medical imagery remains the cornerstone of diagnosis, the success of complex classification tasks depends on high-quality data and diagnostic features. This study evaluates image pre-processing and feature extraction to optimize model performance. Our investigation assesses how variations in pre-processing and feature extraction impact classification efficiency across three imaging modalities: radiology (chest X-ray images), pathology (H&E (Hematoxylin and Eosin)-stained patches), and ophthalmology (OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography) scans). The experimental framework incorporates nine pre-processing techniques, adjustment (brightness, contrast, and histogram equalization), filtering (mean, median, and Gaussian), and three normalization schemes, systematically combined for each modality. Features were extracted using five pre-trained architectures (VGG16, ResNet50, DenseNet121, MobileNetV2, and InceptionV3) and classified via a PCA-LDA (Principal Component Analysis-Linear Discriminant Analysis) pipeline. Performance was evaluated using the mean sensitivity score. Mean sensitivity scores improved significantly: H&E-stained images increased from 74·9% to 96·95%, chest X-rays from 89·9% to 96·65%, and OCT scans from 82·4% to 98·8%. No single pre-processing configuration consistently dominated; optimal settings varied by modality, confirming the absence of a universal solution. VGG16 and DenseNet121 exhibited the greatest robustness. Implementing at least one pre-processing step combined with a robust DL feature extractor can substantially improve model efficacy in diagnostic detection tasks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dehbozorgi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: