The conversion of Saul of Tarsus on the Damascus road is among the most consequential events in religious history, yet scholarly treatment of it remains fragmented: historical-critical, theological, and psychological studies have each examined the event in isolation, leaving no integrated account of what the sources describe. The purpose of this qualitative, interdisciplinary study was to provide a comprehensive, multi-dimensional analysis of the Damascus Road Christophany, holding its theological, historical, and psycho-spiritual dimensions in a single, mutually correcting frame. The research employed a historical-critical design integrating four methods: textual and narrative analysis of the five major New Testament accounts (Acts 9; 22; 26; Galatians 1; 1 Corinthians 15), historical contextualization within Second Temple Jewish visionary traditions, patristic reception-history analysis, and the heuristic application of five psycho-spiritual transformation models, all conducted on publicly accessible databases. Four principal findings emerged. First, synoptic comparison of the five accounts yields a stable historical core beneath rhetorically motivated variation. Second, the event constitutes a Christophany, a distinct revelatory category that Paul deliberately aligns with the resurrection appearances rather than with subjective visionary experience. Third, the experience was Jewish in form yet unprecedented in content: it conforms to the merkavah throne-vision pattern while identifying the enthroned Glory with the crucified Jesus, an identification the tradition could not have generated. Fourth, five psychological frameworks converge on a transformation that redirected rather than erased Saul's personality structure, supporting a synthesis in which the event is simultaneously conversion, prophetic call, and apocalyptic revelation. The study's original contribution is the Multi-Dimensional Christophany Model, a framework that integrates objective revelatory claims with historical intelligibility and psychological process without reducing any dimension to another. The findings carry implications for Pauline scholarship, for ecumenical dialogue over Paul's relationship to Judaism, and for pastoral engagement with radical religious transformation.
Laszlo Pokorny (Wed,) studied this question.