Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Robotic-assisted spinal surgery has reportedly improved the accuracy of instrumentation with smaller incisions, improving surgical outcomes and reducing hospital stay. However, robot-assisted spine surgery has thus far been confined to placement of pedicle screw instrumentation only. This pilot study aims to explore the feasibility of utilizing the Mazor™ X Stealth Edition (Medtronic, Sofamor Danek USA), robotic-arm platform in the minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) procedure inclusive of interbody cage placement, in our institution. Methods: Single-centre, single surgeon prospectively collected case series of 29 patients who were planned for robot-assisted MIS-TLIF (RA-TLIF) with Mazor™ X Stealth system, on patient demographics [age, gender, body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)], and post-operative outcomes. Results: Of the 29 RA-TLIF cases planned, 2 cases were excluded due to software start-up issues. One patient underwent revision surgery for posterior-migrated interbody cage. No loosening of posterior instrumentation was seen in all cases at 6 months follow-up. Conclusions: Our single-institution pilot study on the Mazor™ X Stealth RA-TLIF has shown high pedicle screw insertion accuracy and relatively low complication rates, comparable to that of conventional MIS-TLIF O-arm navigation system. However, the discerning surgeon should be on the lookout for potential system-related pitfalls, as well as understand the limitations for robotic interbody cage placement. Further studies will also be required on patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness prior to consideration for wide scale implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: