Key result
Home blood pressure telemonitoring significantly reduced systolic blood pressure in urban hypertensive patients, with a weighted mean difference of 11.900 mmHg at 2 months (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Factors affecting the effectiveness of home blood pressure telemonitoring needed to be examined in an integrated analysis in urban hypertensive patients.
Do home blood pressure telemonitoring systems reduce systolic blood pressure in urban hypertensive patients?
Systematic Review
Do home blood pressure telemonitoring systems reduce systolic blood pressure in urban hypertensive patients?
Home blood pressure telemonitoring effectively reduces systolic blood pressure in urban hypertensive patients, with greater effects seen with shorter duration, daily transmission, and telephone-based pathways.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports HBPT for hypertension control; confirms efficacy of telemonitoring in meta-analysis of trials.
Background: Factors affecting the effectiveness of telemonitoring in home blood pressure telemonitoring (HBPT) must be examined in an integrated analysis in urban hypertensive patients. Materials and Methods: In a systematic review of electronic databases, we retrieved 1,433 citations and selected 34 comparisons. Specified moderators were the duration of the intervention, the frequency of remote transmission of blood pressure (BP) data, the additional intervention, and the intervention pathway. Results: For the duration of follow-up of HBPT, the weighted mean difference (WMD) in systolic blood pressure (SBP) between two groups was 11.900 mmHg (p-value <0.001) at 2 months and 3.024 mmHg (p = 0.002) at 12 months. The WMD in SBP was 5.512 mmHg (p < 0.001) in cases where data were transmitted daily and 1.818 mmHg (p = 0.084) for monthly transmission. For the group in which further interventions with HBPT were conducted, the WMD in SBP was 3.813 mmHg (p < 0.001). For patients who did not receive additional interventions, the WMD was 2.747 mmHg (p = 0.005). For the pathway of HBPT, the WMD was 6.800 mmHg (p = 0.053) when BP values were remote transmitted through letter, 3.041 mmHg (p = 0.001) through mobile phone/web, 2.224 mmHg (p = 0.043) through telephone-linked computer system, and 4.352 mmHg (p < 0.001) through telephone. Conclusions: The effects of moderators of HBPT systems utilized with urban hypertensive patients differ from those in interventions that did not distinguish urban from rural areas. Results for duration of implementation and frequency of data transmission were significant. Among the interventions using telecommunications, the telephone was the most effective in comparison to other channels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2019) conducted a systematic review in Hypertension. Home blood pressure telemonitoring (HBPT) vs. Control was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure (SBP) (WMD 11.900 mmHg, p=<0.001). Home blood pressure telemonitoring significantly reduced systolic blood pressure in urban hypertensive patients, with a weighted mean difference of 11.900 mmHg at 2 months (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: