Key result
A personalized, higher pacemaker backup heart rate is being evaluated in the myPACE trial to determine if it improves quality of life compared to a standard 60 bpm setting in patients with HFpEF or isolated diastolic dysfunction.
Why the study?
Pacemaker patients with HFpEF or isolated diastolic dysfunction may benefit from a higher backup heart rate setting compared with standard 60 bpm, but this strategy requires evaluation.
Does a personalized backup heart rate setting improve quality of life (MLHFQ scores) in pacemaker patients with HFpEF or diastolic dysfunction compared to a standard 60 bpm setting?
RCT (n=107)
Blinded
1:1
No
Does a personalized backup heart rate setting improve quality of life (MLHFQ scores) in pacemaker patients with HFpEF or diastolic dysfunction compared to a standard 60 bpm setting?
The myPACE trial is designed to evaluate whether a personalized backup heart rate setting improves quality of life in pacemaker patients with HFpEF or diastolic dysfunction.
Personalized higher backup rates may improve QoL and biomarkers in pacemaker patients with HFpEF; extends standard 60-bpm settings with RCT data.
BackgroundPatients with pacemakers and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or isolated diastolic dysfunction (DD) may benefit from a higher backup heart rate (HR) setting compared with the standard setting of 60 bpm.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess the effects of a personalized backup HR setting (myPACE group) compared with 60 bpm (control group).MethodsIn this prospective, blinded, randomized controlled study, pacemaker patients with DD or HFpEF and atrial pacing with intrinsic ventricular conduction or conduction system or biventricular pacing are randomized to the myPACE group or control group for 1 year. The primary outcome is the change in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) scores. Secondary endpoints include changes in N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide levels, physical and emotional MLHFQ subscores, and pacemaker-detected atrial arrhythmia burden, patient activity levels, and thoracic impedance; hospitalization for heart failure, atrial fibrillation, cerebrovascular accident, or myocardial infarction; and loop diuretic or antiarrhythmic medication initiation or up-titration. A sample size of 118 subjects is expected to allow detection of a 5-point change in MLHFQ score in an intention-to-treat analysis and allow initial assessment of clinical outcomes and subgroup analyses.ResultsEnrollment began in July 2019. As of November 2020, 107 subjects have been enrolled. It is projected that the 1-year follow-up will be completed by December 2021.ConclusionAtrial pacing with intrinsic ventricular conduction or advanced ventricular pacing at a higher, personalized backup HR may be a therapeutic target for patients with isolated DD or HFpEF. The myPACE trial is designed to test this hypothesis. Patients with pacemakers and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or isolated diastolic dysfunction (DD) may benefit from a higher backup heart rate (HR) setting compared with the standard setting of 60 bpm. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of a personalized backup HR setting (myPACE group) compared with 60 bpm (control group). In this prospective, blinded, randomized controlled study, pacemaker patients with DD or HFpEF and atrial pacing with intrinsic ventricular conduction or conduction system or biventricular pacing are randomized to the myPACE group or control group for 1 year. The primary outcome is the change in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) scores. Secondary endpoints include changes in N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide levels, physical and emotional MLHFQ subscores, and pacemaker-detected atrial arrhythmia burden, patient activity levels, and thoracic impedance; hospitalization for heart failure, atrial fibrillation, cerebrovascular accident, or myocardial infarction; and loop diuretic or antiarrhythmic medication initiation or up-titration. A sample size of 118 subjects is expected to allow detection of a 5-point change in MLHFQ score in an intention-to-treat analysis and allow initial assessment of clinical outcomes and subgroup analyses. Enrollment began in July 2019. As of November 2020, 107 subjects have been enrolled. It is projected that the 1-year follow-up will be completed by December 2021. Atrial pacing with intrinsic ventricular conduction or advanced ventricular pacing at a higher, personalized backup HR may be a therapeutic target for patients with isolated DD or HFpEF. The myPACE trial is designed to test this hypothesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Infeld et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Diastolic dysfunction or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (n=107). Personalized backup heart rate setting (myPACE algorithm) vs. Standard 60 bpm setting was evaluated on Change in Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) total scores. A personalized, higher pacemaker backup heart rate is being evaluated in the myPACE trial to determine if it improves quality of life compared to a standard 60 bpm setting in patients with HFpEF or isolated diastolic dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: