Key result
Resting heart rate above 60 bpm predicts higher cardiovascular and all-cause mortality.
Why the study?
The importance of resting heart rate as a prognostic factor and potential therapeutic target is not yet generally accepted.
Does resting heart rate reduction improve outcomes in patients with or without cardiovascular disease?
Does resting heart rate reduction improve outcomes in patients with or without cardiovascular disease?
Resting heart rate is an independent predictor of mortality and a potential therapeutic target, suggesting it should be maintained substantially below 90-100 beats/min.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet alter heart rate targets; leaves open whether lowering improves outcomes.
The importance of resting heart rate (HR) as a prognostic factor and potential therapeutic target is not yet generally accepted. Recent large epidemiologic studies have confirmed earlier studies that showed resting HR to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in men and women with and without diagnosed cardiovascular disease. Clinical trial data suggest that HR reduction itself is an important mechanism of benefit of beta-blockers and other heart-rate lowering drugs used after acute myocardial infarction, in chronic heart failure, and in stable angina pectoris. Pathophysiological studies indicate that a relatively high HR has direct detrimental effects on the progression of coronary atherosclerosis, on the occurrence of myocardial ischemia and ventricular arrhythmias, and on left ventricular function. Studies have found a continuous increase in risk with HR above 60 beats/min. Although it may be difficult to define an optimal HR for a given individual, it seems desirable to maintain resting HR substantially below the traditionally defined tachycardia threshold of 90 or 100 beats/min. These findings suggest that the potential role of HR and its modulation should be considered in future cardiovascular guidance documents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fox et al. (2007) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease. Heart-rate lowering drugs was evaluated. Resting heart rate above 60 beats/min is an independent predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, highlighting the potential benefit of heart-rate lowering therapies.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: