Key result
A resting heart rate ≥83 bpm was associated with a significantly higher risk of total mortality (HR 1.32; 95% CI 1.19-1.47; P<0.0001) compared to ≤62 bpm in patients with coronary artery disease.
Why the study?
Does a higher resting heart rate predict increased mortality and cardiovascular rehospitalization in patients with suspected or proven CAD?
Population
24,913 patients with suspected or proven stable coronary artery disease from the Coronary Artery Surgery…
Comparison
High resting heart rate at baseline (≥83 bpm) vs Low resting heart rate at baseline (≤62 bpm)
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
median 14.7 years
Authors
Loading...
Supports resting heart rate as a prognostic marker in stable CAD; leaves open whether lowering it improves outcomes.
Cohort (n=24,913)
Does a higher resting heart rate predict increased mortality and cardiovascular rehospitalization in patients with suspected or proven CAD?
Effect estimate: HR 1.32 (95% CI 1.19-1.47)
p-value: p=<0.0001
A high resting heart rate (≥83 bpm) is an independent predictor of long-term all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
Díaz et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in suspected or proven coronary artery disease (n=24,913). Resting heart rate ≥83 bpm vs. Resting heart rate ≤62 bpm was evaluated on total mortality (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.19-1.47, p=<0.0001). A resting heart rate ≥83 bpm was associated with a significantly higher risk of total mortality (HR 1.32; 95% CI 1.19-1.47; P<0.0001) compared to ≤62 bpm in patients with coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: