Key result
Resting heart rate ≥83 bpm was associated with a significantly higher risk of total mortality compared to the reference group (HR 1.32; 95% CI 1.19–1.47; P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does elevated resting heart rate increase the risk of mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in patients with suspected or proven coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=24,913)
Does elevated resting heart rate increase the risk of mortality and cardiovascular morbidity in patients with suspected or proven coronary artery disease?
Effect estimate: HR 1.32 (95% CI 1.19-1.47)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Elevated resting heart rate is an independent predictor of long-term mortality and cardiovascular re-hospitalization in patients with coronary artery disease.
May identify higher-risk CAD patients; extends prognostic associations but leaves causal effects and interventions open.
Heart rate is a predictor of major cardiovascular events in both the general population and patients with various cardiovascular diseases. The association between resting heart rate and mortality has been observed in patients with hypertension and with metabolic syndrome and in the elderly. The prognostic value of heart rate has also been shown in patients with stable coronary heart disease. We assessed the relationship between resting heart rate at baseline and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, while adjusting for risk factors. A total of 24 913 patients with suspected or proven coronary artery disease from the Coronary Artery Surgery Study registry were studied for a median follow-up of close to 15 years. All-cause and cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular re-hospitalizations were increased with increasing heart rate (P < 0.0001). When compared with the reference group, patients with resting heart rate ≥83 bpm at baseline had a significantly higher risk for total mortality [hazard ratio 1.32; confidence interval (CI) 1.19–1.47; P < 0.0001] and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio 1.31; CI 1.15–1.48; P < 0.0001) after adjustment for multiple clinical variables. When comparing patients with heart rates between 77–82 and ≥83 bpm with patients with a heart rate ≤62 bpm, the hazard ratios for time to first cardiovascular re-hospitalization were 1.11 and 1.14 (P < 0.001 for both). Resting heart rate has also been shown to be associated with the severity and rate of progression of coronary atherosclerosis and to be an independent predictor of plaque rupture in coronary arteries. Resting heart rate is a simple measurement with prognostic implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J.‐C. Tardif (2008) conducted a cohort in suspected or proven coronary artery disease (n=24,913). Resting heart rate ≥83 bpm vs. Resting heart rate ≤62 bpm was evaluated on total mortality (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.19-1.47, p=<0.0001). Resting heart rate ≥83 bpm was associated with a significantly higher risk of total mortality compared to the reference group (HR 1.32; 95% CI 1.19–1.47; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: