Key result
This review discusses the potential role and unclear benefit of laboratory monitoring in the management of patients receiving DOAC specific antidotes such as idarucizumab and andexanet alfa.
Why the study?
The benefit of laboratory monitoring following DOAC reversal remains unclear despite the increasing need for rapid neutralization during major bleeding or urgent procedures.
What is the role of laboratory monitoring in the management of patients receiving DOAC specific antidotes?
What is the role of laboratory monitoring in the management of patients receiving DOAC specific antidotes?
While laboratory monitoring can guide the initial administration of DOAC antidotes, its utility following reversal remains unclear and requires further investigation.
May support expanded DOAC reversal options; leaves open efficacy of emerging agents in practice.
Given the growing number of patients receiving direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), patients requiring rapid neutralization is also increasing in case of major bleedings or urgent surgery/procedures. Idarucizumab is commercialized as a specific antidote to dabigatran while andexanet alfa has gained the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency approval as an oral anti-factor Xa inhibitors antidote. Other antidotes or hemostatic agents are still under preclinical or clinical development, the most advanced being ciraparantag. DOAC plasma levels measurement allows to appropriately select patient for antidote administration and may prevent unnecessary prescription of expensive molecules in some acute clinical settings. However, these tests might be inconclusive after some antidote administration, namely andexanet alfa and ciraparantag. The benefit of laboratory monitoring following DOAC reversal remains unclear. Here, we sought to provide an overview of the key studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of DOAC reversal using the most developed/commercialized specific antidotes, to discuss the potential role of the laboratory monitoring in the management of patients receiving DOAC specific antidotes and to highlight the areas that deserve further investigations in order to establish the exact role of laboratory monitoring in the appropriate management of DOAC specific antidotes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gendron et al. (2024) conducted a review in Patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants requiring rapid neutralization. Laboratory monitoring for DOAC specific antidotes was evaluated. This review discusses the potential role and unclear benefit of laboratory monitoring in the management of patients receiving DOAC specific antidotes such as idarucizumab and andexanet alfa.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: