Key result
Monitoring via heparin anti-Xa assay during transition from oral anti-Xa anticoagulants to heparin resulted in 10 bleeds and 1 thrombus among 69 patients (15.9%).
Why the study?
To determine a patient's clinical course based on using an aPTT versus a heparin anti-Xa assay when transitioning from rivaroxaban or apixaban to an unfractionated heparin infusion.
Does heparin anti-Xa assay monitoring compared to aPTT monitoring affect bleeding and thrombotic events in hospitalized patients transitioning from rivaroxaban or apixaban to unfractionated heparin?
Cohort (n=76)
No
Does heparin anti-Xa assay monitoring compared to aPTT monitoring affect bleeding and thrombotic events in hospitalized patients transitioning from rivaroxaban or apixaban to unfractionated heparin?
Baseline heparin anti-Xa activity may be a useful tool to identify patients with residual plasma concentrations of apixaban and rivaroxaban to help better individualize heparin therapy during transition.
May influence heparin management post-DOAC; leaves open optimal assay for safe transitions.
PURPOSE: To determine a patient's clinical course based on the use of an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or heparin anti-Xa assay when transitioning from rivaroxaban or apixaban to an unfractionated heparin infusion. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted to investigate how unfractionated heparin infusions were managed at a tertiary care hospital in the setting of recent apixaban or rivaroxaban administration. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts based on the chosen heparin infusion monitoring assay: heparin anti-Xa or aPTT. The primary composite outcome was total number of bleeding and thrombotic events; the secondary composite outcome was average incidence of heparin infusion holds and rate changes per patient. RESULTS: Data were collected from 76 patients (heparin anti-Xa = 69, aPTT = 7). Due to the limited number of patients within the aPTT cohort, this data was excluded from the analysis, and heparin anti-Xa descriptive statistics were reported without statistical comparisons. In the heparin anti-Xa group, a total of 10 bleeds and 1 thrombus were discovered. Additionally, the average number of infusion holds and rate changes was 0.841 and 2.65 times per patient, respectively, for those patients monitored via heparin anti-Xa assay. CONCLUSION: In the presence of a recently administered oral anti-Xa anticoagulant, more down-titrations occurred in the initial 6 hours of the heparin infusion when measuring anti-Xa activity, and most up-titrations occurred after 36 hours. Baseline heparin anti-Xa activity may be a useful tool to identify patients with residual plasma concentrations of apixaban and rivaroxaban to help better individualize heparin therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Transitioning from rivaroxaban or apixaban to unfractionated heparin infusion (n=76). Heparin anti-Xa assay monitoring vs. aPTT monitoring was evaluated on Total number of bleeding and thrombotic events. Monitoring via heparin anti-Xa assay during transition from oral anti-Xa anticoagulants to heparin resulted in 10 bleeds and 1 thrombus among 69 patients (15.9%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: