Key result
Switching apixaban or rivaroxaban to UFH is linked to a ~27% bleeding or thrombotic complication rate.
Why the study?
Transitioning patients from apixaban or rivaroxaban to UFH infusions can skew anti-Xa monitoring assays due to residual factor Xa inhibitor activity.
Does transitioning from apixaban or rivaroxaban to unfractionated heparin infusion cause adverse bleeding or thrombotic events in hospitalized patients?
Cohort (n=48)
No
Does transitioning from apixaban or rivaroxaban to unfractionated heparin infusion cause adverse bleeding or thrombotic events in hospitalized patients?
Transitioning from apixaban or rivaroxaban to unfractionated heparin infusion in hospitalized patients is associated with a 25% incidence of bleeding events, highlighting the importance of baseline anti-Xa monitoring to guide UFH initiation.
Suggests caution with DOAC-to-UFH transitions in hospitalized patients; leaves open whether baseline anti-Xa monitoring improves safety.
Background: The use of direct factor Xa inhibitors, such as apixaban and rivaroxaban, has improved medication adherence. However, in certain situations during hospital admission, patients on these medications may need to be transitioned to unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusions. This transition can skew results of anticoagulation monitoring, such as the anti-Xa assay, due to residual factor-Xa inhibitor activity. Methods: We conducted this retrospective chart among admitted patients to St. Vincent's Medical Center in Bridgeport, CT between December 2020 till June 2022. Patients who were maintained on Apixaban or Rivaroxaban, factor-Xa inhibitors, and were transitioned to unfractionated intravenous drip were included. A baseline plasma anti-Xa level was noted. Assessment for thrombotic or bleeding events during hospitalization was performed. Results: A total of 48 patients were included in this study. The majority of patients were bridged to UFH for NSTEMI (31%) or pre-procedure (23%). The mean baseline anti-Xa for all patients was 0.92 U/mL. Twelve patients (25%) and one patient (2%) of patients had bleeding and thrombotic events, respectively. Although the mean baseline anti-Xa level was higher for patients who had an adverse event compared to no event, the difference was non-statistically significant. Fifty seven percent of patients who had an adverse event had a supratherapeutic plasma anti-Xa baseline level. A gastrointestinal bleed was the most common type of bleeding event. Conclusions: To prevent thrombotic or bleeding events, we suggest adopting a standard practice of obtaining a baseline anti-Xa level in patients with recent exposure to factor Xa inhibitors in order to guide the timing of UFH initiation, the dosing of heparin, and determine the need for alternative assays, such as the activated partial thromboplastin clotting time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasbani et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Patients on apixaban or rivaroxaban transitioned to unfractionated heparin (n=48). Intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) was evaluated on Incidence of adverse events (minor bleeding, major bleeding, and thrombosis). Transitioning patients from apixaban or rivaroxaban to unfractionated heparin was associated with a 27% incidence of bleeding or thrombotic complications, with 57% of affected patients having supratherapeutic baseline anti-Xa levels.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: