Why the study?
Direct oral factor Xa inhibitors may falsely elevate anti-Xa assays, creating a challenge when patients transition from Xa inhibitors to IV UFH.
Does transitioning from direct oral factor Xa inhibitors to IV UFH increase the time to reach therapeutic range compared to patients not previously anticoagulated?
Does transitioning from direct oral factor Xa inhibitors to IV UFH increase the time to reach therapeutic range compared to patients not previously anticoagulated?
Transitioning from oral factor Xa inhibitors to intravenous unfractionated heparin significantly delays the time to reach a therapeutic anti-Xa range and requires more laboratory monitoring compared to de novo heparin initiation.
Transitioning from Xa inhibitors delays therapeutic anti-Xa range on IV UFH; leaves open optimal monitoring strategies in prospective trials.
Purpose: Direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (Xa inhibitor) may falsely elevate anti-Xa assays, creating a challenge when patients transition from Xa inhibitors to intravenous unfractionated heparin (IV UFH). This study compared the time to therapeutic anti-Xa range in patients transitioning from Xa inhibitors to IV UFH to those not previously anticoagulated and initiated on IV UFH. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included adults receiving IV UFH from August 2018 through August 2019. The study group received apixaban or rivaroxaban prior to the initiation of IV UFH, and the control group was not previously anticoagulated. The primary outcome was the time to reach therapeutic range. Secondary outcomes included the number of anti-Xa levels drawn to reach therapeutic range, incidence of treatment failure, and incidence of major bleeding episodes. Categorical and continuous data were analyzed with chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests, respectively. Results: The time to reach therapeutic range was a median of 18.5 hours in the study group (IQR 14.9-26.9) compared to 7.3 hours (IQR 5.9-14.7) in the control group ( P < .001). Two anti-Xa levels were drawn in the study group (IQR 1-4) compared to 1 (IQR 1-2) in the control group ( P < .001). There was no difference in the incidence of treatment failures ( P = .981) or major bleeding episodes ( P = .972). Conclusions: In patients transitioning from Xa inhibitors to IV UFH, the time to therapeutic range was longer and required additional laboratory tests compared to those not previously anticoagulated. Further research is needed to examine the incidence of treatment failures or major bleeding episodes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lawing et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: