Key result
A novel 3D myocardial model created using hybrid 3D printing and silicone molding accurately reflected anatomical details and allowed for successful surgical rehearsal of transapical myectomy.
Why the study?
To implement a novel resectable myocardial model for mock myectomy using hybrid 3D printing and silicone molding in apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Does a hybrid 3D printing and silicone molding model accurately replicate myocardial anatomy for mock myectomy in patients with ApHCM?
Case Report (n=3)
No
Does a hybrid 3D printing and silicone molding model accurately replicate myocardial anatomy for mock myectomy in patients with ApHCM?
A hybrid 3D printing and silicone molding model accurately replicates myocardial anatomy and may be useful for surgical planning and rehearsal of myectomy in apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
May aid ApHCM myectomy planning; leaves open clinical adoption of 3D-printed models pending validation.
OBJECTIVE: We implemented a novel resectable myocardial model for mock myectomy using a hybrid method of three-dimensional (3D) printing and silicone molding for patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (ApHCM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2019 through May 2020, 3D models from three patients with ApHCM were generated using the end-diastolic cardiac CT phase image. After computer-aided designing of measures to prevent structural deformation during silicone injection into molding, 3D printing was performed to reproduce anatomic details and molds for the left ventricular (LV) myocardial mass. We compared the myocardial thickness of each cardiac segment and the LV myocardial mass and cavity volumes between the myocardial model images and cardiac CT images. The surgeon performed mock surgery, and we compared the volume and weight of the resected silicone and myocardium. RESULTS: During the mock surgery, the surgeon could determine an ideal site for the incision and the optimal extent of myocardial resection. The mean differences in the measured myocardial thickness of the model (0.3, 1.0, 6.9, and 7.3 mm in the basal, midventricular, apical segments, and apex, respectively) and volume of the LV myocardial mass and chamber (36.9 mL and 14.8 mL, 2.9 mL and -9.4 mL, and 6.0 mL and -3.0 mL in basal, mid-ventricular and apical segments, respectively) were consistent with cardiac CT. The volume and weight of the resected silicone were similar to those of the resected myocardium (6 mL [6.2 g] of silicone and 5 mL [5.3 g] of the myocardium in patient 2; 12 mL [12.5 g] of silicone and 11.2 mL [11.8 g] of the myocardium in patient 3). CONCLUSION: Our 3D model created using hybrid 3D printing and silicone molding may be useful for determining the extent of surgery and planning surgery guided by a rehearsal platform for ApHCM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2021) conducted a case report in Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=3). Mock myectomy using a hybrid 3D-printed and silicone-molded myocardial model was evaluated on Comparison of the volume and weight of resected silicone during mock surgery with the actual resected myocardium. A novel 3D myocardial model created using hybrid 3D printing and silicone molding accurately reflected anatomical details and allowed for successful surgical rehearsal of transapical myectomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: