Key result
A single session of interferential current therapy significantly increased parasympathetic activity, decreased sympathetic activity, and reduced perceived pain compared to sham (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.44).
Why the study?
The study evaluated the effects of interferential current therapy on heart rate variability and pain perception in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain.
Does a single session of interferential current therapy improve heart rate variability and reduce pain perception in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain?
RCT (n=49)
Randomly divided
Does a single session of interferential current therapy improve heart rate variability and reduce pain perception in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain?
A single session of interferential current therapy shifts autonomic balance towards parasympathetic dominance and reduces pain in patients with chronic low back pain.
Interferential current therapy (ICT) is an electrotherapeutic intervention that combines the advantages of high permeability from middle frequency currents and efficient tissue stimulation from low frequency currents, delivering the maximum current with high tissue permeability. The aim was to evaluate the effects of ICT on heart rate variability (HRV) and on pain perception in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP). In the study, 49 patients with NSCLBP were randomly divided into an experimental (EG) and a sham group (SG). All participants received a single intervention, ICT, or simulated intervention. Outcome measures including baseline (sit-down position) and postintervention (prone position) pain, heart rate (HR), time domain parameter (rMSSD), diameters of the Poincaré plot (SD1, SD2), stress score (SS), and sympathetic/parasympathetic (S/PS) ratio were investigated. In both groups, significant statistical differences were found in perceived pain and in all HRV parameters except in HRmax. Between-group comparisons showed statistically significant differences in all variables except for HRmin and HRmean in favor of the experimental group. These changes reported an increase in parasympathetic activity (rMSSD) (p < 0.05) and a decrease in sympathetic activity (increase in SD2 and decrease in SS) (p < 0.001) and perceived pain (p < 0.001), with a greater size effect (η2 = 0.44) in favor of the experimental group. In conclusion, a single session of ICT can shift the autonomic balance towards increase parasympathetic dominance and decrease the sympathetic dominance and intensity of pain perceived by patients with NSCLBP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Espejo-Antúnez et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) (n=49). Interferential current therapy (ICT) vs. Sham intervention was evaluated on Heart rate variability (HRV) parameters and perceived pain (η2 = 0.44, p=<0.001). A single session of interferential current therapy significantly increased parasympathetic activity, decreased sympathetic activity, and reduced perceived pain compared to sham (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.44).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: