Why the study?
Vasovagal reactions occasionally occur during interferential current electrical stimulation, prompting an examination of autonomic activity variations via heart rate variability in asymptomatic individuals.
Does interferential current application on the lower back alter autonomic activity measured by HRV in asymptomatic male volunteers?
Does interferential current application on the lower back alter autonomic activity measured by HRV in asymptomatic male volunteers?
Interferential current application on the lower back increases parasympathetic modulation, highlighting the need to monitor for potential vasovagal reactions during treatment.
IFC may heighten vasovagal risk via parasympathetic shift; leaves open whether HRV monitoring prevents reactions in practice.
Vasovagal reactions may occur occasionally during electrical stimulation using interferential current (IFC). The purpose of this study was to examine variations in autonomic activity during the application of IFC in asymptomatic participants by analysis of their heart rate variability (HRV). Seventy-three male volunteers were randomly assigned to a placebo group (n = 36; HRV was documented for 10 min, both at rest and during a placebo intervention) and an intervention group (n = 37; HRV was documented for 10 min in two conditions labelled as (1) rest and (2) application of IFC technique on the lumbar segment). The diameters of the Poincaré plot (SD1, SD2), stress score (SS), and the ratio between sympathetic and parasympathetic activity (S/PS) were measured. After interventions, differences amongst the placebo group and the IFC group were found in SD2 (p < 0.001), SS (p = 0.01) and S/PS ratio (p = 0.003). The IFC technique was associated with increased parasympathetic modulation, which could induce a vasovagal reaction. Monitorization of adverse reactions should be implemented during the application of IFC technique. HRV indicators might have a part in prevention of vasovagal reactions. Further studies in patients with lumbar pain are needed to explore possible differences in HRV responses due to the presence of chronic pain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
De-la-Cruz-Torres et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: