Key result
Female assembly line operators experiencing high levels of stress demonstrated significantly longer work cycle times (16.7 vs 11.72 seconds) and lower physiological coherence compared to controls.
Why the study?
Studies investigating whether stress concurrently influences physiological and objective work performance were lacking.
Does high stress reduce physiological coherence and work performance in female industrial operators?
Case-Control (n=36)
Control group randomly selected from eligible pool
No
Does high stress reduce physiological coherence and work performance in female industrial operators?
Absolute Event Rate: 16.7% vs 11.72%
p-value: p=<0.05
High stress in female industrial operators is associated with reduced physiological coherence (HRV) and longer work cycle times, highlighting the need for workplace stress interventions.
High stress was associated with slower performance and lower coherence in female operators; hypothesis-generating, prospective trials needed before interventions.
Elevated stress has been widely associated with physical and physiological threats as well as reduced work performance. However, there is still a lack of studies that investigate whether stress influences concurrently physiological and objective work performance. The purpose of this study is to examine whether workers’ level of stress or negative emotional symptoms correlates with their physiological coherence and work performance. Eighteen female operators who reported high severity levels of stress, assessed using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-42) were categorized as the risk group. The comparison group was formed by randomly selecting 18 of 99 female workers who had significantly lower DASS scores. Both participants attended one session of physiological measurement. Their work performance was observed by calculating their cycle time completing a product during five workdays. A significant difference in HRV between the two groups was also found in physiological and work performance measures. The results showed that workers in the risk group obtained significantly lower coherence levels and longer work cycle time than the control participants, indicating that negative emotional symptoms were parallel with physiological coherence and work performance. However, a weak correlation was found between work performance and negative emotional symptoms as well as physiological coherence. Despite the study limitations, our findings support to evidence the more complete picture of how stress affects female worker’s physiology and work performance, suggesting a need to implement effective workplace stress intervention. Further study is needed to be conducted among different group characteristics such as male and occupational settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khairai et al. (2020) conducted a case-control in Occupational stress (n=36). High severity of stress vs. Normal to moderate stress was evaluated on Work cycle time (seconds) (p=<0.05). Female assembly line operators experiencing high levels of stress demonstrated significantly longer work cycle times (16.7 vs 11.72 seconds) and lower physiological coherence compared to controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: