Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Methods: -RD and 10 normally-sighted subjects undertook three assessments of mobility: following a straight line, navigating a simple maze, and stepping over a sidewalk "kerb." Performance was quantified as the time taken to complete each assessment, number of errors made, walking speed, and percent preferred walking speed, for each assessment. Subjects also undertook assessments of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, full-field static perimetry, and age-appropriate quality of life questionnaires. To identify the most relevant metric to quantify vision-guided mobility, we investigated repeatability, as well as convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity. We also measured the effect of illumination on mobility. A relatively small mean difference (-0.09 m/s) was identified in comparison to a relatively large repeatability coefficient (1.10 m/s). Translational Relevance: -RD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumaran et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: