Electrical response in chemical potential equalization schemes

In this paper we compare the polarization response given by two different chemical potential equalization schemes to be applied to molecular dynamics simulations: the standard fluctuating point charge model (FQ) and the atom–atom charge transfer model (AACT). We have tested the transferability of FQ and AACT parameters, fitted to the polarizability of small size alkanes and polyenes, to large size homologues. We show that the FQ scheme is not adequate for the n-alkanes as it strongly overestimates the polarizability tensor components as the number of carbon atoms increases. The FQ approach has been found more predictive for highly conjugated systems like polyenes, although still unsatisfactory. The AACT parameters tuned on ethane are instead perfectly transferable to alkanes of any length and conformation. The AACT scheme satisfactorily reproduces the polarization response also for highly conjugated systems.