Key result
Fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support resulted in a significantly lower mechanical failure rate (4.3%) compared to negative medial cortical support (31.2%) in proximal femoral nailing.
Why the study?
Despite biomechanical advantages, complications like screw cut out, Z effect, and reverse Z effect occur with proximal femoral nailing for unstable intertrochanteric fractures, prompting analysis of factors determining mechanical failures.
What factors determine mechanical failures in patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail?
Cohort (n=72)
No
What factors determine mechanical failures in patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail?
Fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support and a tip apex distance difference >15 mm between antirotation and lag screws reduce mechanical failure in proximal femoral nailing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Positive medial cortical support and TAD difference >15 mm may lower mechanical failure after PFN; leaves open need for randomized trials before changing practice.
Background: Intertrochanteric fractures are one of the commonest fractures encountered in elderly population. Though there are various implants, proximal femoral nail has been the standard choice for management of unstable fractures. Inspite of its biomechanical advantages, various complications like screw cut out, Z effect, reverse Z effect does occur in proximal femoral nailing. The aim of the study is to analyse various factors determining the mechanical failures in patients operated with proximal femoral nail. Methods: This is a prospective study conducted in our institution from June 2014 to May 2018. The study included 72 patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail. All patients were followed for average period of 2 years. Functional outcome was assessed using Harris Hip score. Results: Among the patients 33% had excellent outcome. 42% had good and 14% had fair outcome. 11% of cases ended with poor outcome. Mechanical failure rate was less in patients with positive medial cortical support (PMCS) and in patients with tip apex distance difference between antirotation screw and lag screw (TADAR-TADLS) more than 15 mm. Whereas the difference in the position of lag screw centre had no significant influence in the mechanical failure rate in our study. Conclusions: From our study we like to conclude that the fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support and the TAD difference play a major role in determining the incidence of mechanical failure in proximal femoral nailing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramachandran et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Unstable intertrochanteric fractures (n=72). Positive medial cortical support (PMCS) vs. Negative medial cortical support (NMCS) was evaluated on Mechanical failure (screw cut out, Z effect, reverse Z effect) (p=0.014). Fracture reduction with positive medial cortical support resulted in a significantly lower mechanical failure rate (4.3%) compared to negative medial cortical support (31.2%) in proximal femoral nailing.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: