Biochar has been promoted as a means to sequester C and improve soil quality. Biochar produced from agricultural waste streams and recycled as a soil amendment also provides a strategy for improved nutrient management in agricultural systems. The effects of biochar amendment on soil C and N cycling remain poorly constrained. This study aimed to examine the effects of biochar on soil C and N storage, N mineralization, and soil physiochemical properties. Soils were collected from a field experiment in which biochar derived from poultry manure was applied for 2 yr in two croplands differing in soil texture (sandy and silt‐loam). Samples from biochar‐amended and control soils were physically fractionated to separate water‐stable soil aggregates and analyzed for C and N. Biochar amendments increased total soil C by 16 (sandy soil) and 30% (silt‐loam soil). These increases were observed in aggregate size classes associated with short‐term C and N storage in silt‐loam soils and intermediate‐term C and N storage in sandy soils. Net N mineralization rates observed in a short‐term incubation were small or negative (1.79 and −24.7 μg N g −1 soil for sandy and silt‐loam soils, respectively), indicating little or no new N mineralization from biochar over short timescales. Biochar amendment had a positive impact on cation exchange capacity at both sites, increasing it by 7 and 11% in the silt‐loam soil and sandy soil, respectively. These results suggest that biochar amendments to cropping systems can improve the capacity of soil to retain nutrients and store C and N. Core Ideas Generating biochar from manure is a strategy for sustainable nutrient management. Manure‐derived biochar was applied in two agricultural soil contexts. Biochar increased soil C and N, with more pronounced effects with higher clay content. Biochar improved soil physiochemical properties, including cation exchange capacity. Biochar provided a source of plant available N, with lower nitrification rates in sandy soils.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clark et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: