Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The results of a numerical study of the horizontal deformations of reinforced soil walls with a continuous panel facing are presented. The most important material parameters are shown to be the reinforcement stiffness density and the backfill soil friction angle. The soil-facing interface friction angle, reinforcement-soil friction angle, soil Young's modulus, and facing rigidity are less important. For backfill soil having a friction angle greater than or equal to 35°, the common practice of using a truncated reinforcement scheme with reinforcement length equal to 70% of the wall height was found to be justified. Increasing the reinforcement length did not significantly reduce deformations; however, reducing the length below about 45% of the wall height did significantly increase deformations. Equally spaced reinforcement was found to give lower deformations than a "balanced" scheme, in which the spacing of reinforcement decreases with depth to provide a more uniform distribution of force in the reinforcement layers. A comparison of the numerical results and the results from an approximate method indicates reasonable agreement and identifies situations where the approximate method is most likely to give accurate results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rowe et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: