Key result
General anesthesia with sevoflurane and spinal anesthesia resulted in no significant differences in biochemical or clinical neonatal outcomes during elective cesarean section.
RCT (n=40)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No difference supports flexible anesthetic choice in elective cesarean; leaves open confirmation via larger prospective trials.
, , . , methyl isopropyl sevoflurane ((CF3)2 CHOCH2F, fluoromethyl-1, 1, 1, 3, 3, 3,-hexafluoro-2-propylether) 1970 , - (blood-gas solubility) 0.686 0.0074 ( ) 1,2) 3,4) sevoflurane
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2003) conducted an RCT in Elective cesarean section (n=40). General anesthesia with sevoflurane vs. Spinal anesthesia was evaluated on Neonatal outcome (umbilical artery gas analysis and Apgar scores). General anesthesia with sevoflurane and spinal anesthesia resulted in no significant differences in biochemical or clinical neonatal outcomes during elective cesarean section.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: