Key result
Elderly patients who reported having a discharge conversation had significantly higher DICARES-M scores (4.02 vs 3.62) compared to those who did not, indicating better perceived discharge quality.
Why the study?
Discharge conversations prepare patients for post-hospitalisation, but their association with discharge quality measured by elderly patients' experiences needed investigation.
Does having a discharge conversation improve patient-reported discharge quality in elderly patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=487)
Yes
Does having a discharge conversation improve patient-reported discharge quality in elderly patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 4.02% vs 3.62%
p-value: p=<0.001
Having a discharge conversation is significantly associated with better patient-reported experiences and higher perceived quality of hospital discharge care in elderly patients.
Background: Discharge conversation is an essential part of preparing patients for the period after hospitalisation. Successful communication during such conversations is associated with improved health outcomes for patients. Objective: To investigate the association between discharge conversation and discharge quality assessed by measuring elderly patients' experiences. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed all patients ≥65 years who had been discharged from two medical units in two hospitals in Western Norway 30 days prior. We measured patient experiences using two previously validated instruments: The Discharge Care Experiences Survey Modified (DICARES-M) and The Nordic Patient Experiences Questionnaire (NORPEQ). We examined differences in characteristics between patients who reported having a discharge conversation with those who did not, and used regression analyses to examine the associations of the DICARES-M and NORPEQ with the usefulness of discharge conversation. Results: Of the 1418 invited patients, 487 (34%) returned the survey. Their mean age was 78.5 years (SD=8.3) and 52% were women. The total sample mean scores for the DICARES-M and NORPEQ were 3.9 (SD=0.7, range: 1.5-5.0) and 4.0 (SD=0.7, range: 2.2-5.0), respectively. Higher DICARES-M and NORPEQ scores were found for patients who reported having a discharge conversation (74%) compared with those who did not (15%), or were unsure (11%) whether they had a conversation (p<0.001). Patients who considered the conversation more useful had significantly higher scores on both the DICARES-M and NORPEQ (p<0.001). Conclusions: Reported discharge conversation at the hospital was correlated with positive patient experiences measurements indicating the increased quality of hospital discharge care. The reported usefulness of the conversation had a significant association with discharge care quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boge et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Hospital discharge (n=487). Discharge conversation vs. No discharge conversation or unsure was evaluated on Discharge Care Experiences Survey Modified (DICARES-M) score (p=<0.001). Elderly patients who reported having a discharge conversation had significantly higher DICARES-M scores (4.02 vs 3.62) compared to those who did not, indicating better perceived discharge quality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: