Key result
Prone sleeping decreased sleep transitions, increased QT and JT intervals, and reduced heart rate variability at 1 month corrected age compared to supine sleeping.
Why the study?
Does prone sleeping position alter sleep patterns, heart rate variability, and QT interval in premature infants compared to supine position?
Observational (n=16)
Does prone sleeping position alter sleep patterns, heart rate variability, and QT interval in premature infants compared to supine position?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not change sleep position recommendations in premature infants; hypothesis-generating for autonomic effects on QT and HRV.
OBJECTIVE: Prone sleeping position has a strong link to sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), and the "Back to Sleep" campaign has played an important role in reducing SIDS. We tested the hypothesis that the mechanism of the sleep position effect is based on changes in sleep, arousal, heart rate variability (HRV), and the QT interval of the electrocardiogram. STUDY DESIGN: We studied 16 premature infants longitudinally, at 1 and 3 months' corrected age. Videosomnography recordings were made during the infants' normal daytime naps. Each infant was recorded in both supine and prone positions. The recordings were analyzed in 30-second epochs, which were classified as awake, active sleep (AS), quiet sleep (QS), or indeterminate sleep. Electrocardiogram data were sampled with an accuracy of 1 millisecond. Time domain analysis of HRV was measured by standard deviation of all R-R intervals and by the square root of the mean of the sum of the squares of the differences between adjacent R-R intervals. Frequency domain analysis was done for low frequency (0.04-0.14 Hz) and high frequency (0.15-0.5 Hz) HRV. We measured QT, JT, and R-R intervals during AS and QS for each position. RESULTS: We found no significant differences between supine and prone position, either in total sleep time or in percentage of QS. Percentage of AS was significantly lower in the supine position, but only at 1 month corrected age. The incidence of short, spontaneous, sleep transitions was significantly higher in supine, also only at 1 month corrected age. Time domain analysis of HRV showed a significantly lower variability in prone, but only during QS. Frequency domain analysis of HRV showed no differences between the 2 sleeping positions. Both QT and JT intervals were significantly longer in prone during QS, but only at 1 month corrected age. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the commonly held belief, prone position did not substantially increase total sleep at these ages. On the other hand, prone sleeping decreased the number of sleep transitions at 1 month corrected age, increased QT and JT intervals, and reduced HRV, thereby potentially increasing the vulnerability for SIDS. This study supports "Back to Sleep" as the position of choice not only for term but also for preterm infants after discharge home.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ariagno et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Premature infants (n=16). Prone sleeping position vs. Supine sleeping position was evaluated on Sleep transitions, heart rate variability, and QT/JT intervals. Prone sleeping decreased sleep transitions, increased QT and JT intervals, and reduced heart rate variability at 1 month corrected age compared to supine sleeping.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: