Key result
Social support plays a fundamental role in improving the quality of life, treatment adherence, and health outcomes of patients with cardiovascular disease.
Why the study?
Does social support improve quality of life in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Does social support improve quality of life in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Social support is a critical psychosocial factor that improves quality of life, treatment adherence, and overall health outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease.
May inform social support assessment in CVD care; leaves open prospective trials to confirm benefits.
Cardiovascular diseases are one of the most serious chronic diseases worldwide and are considered to be the leading cause of death. They have significant effects on physical, mental and psychosocial condition, which seems to worsen patients’ quality of life. Chronic stress, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and anxiety have been scientifically identified as risk factors for cardiovascular disease, but they also affect the severity and progression of the disease. Social support, especially perceived social support is a multidimensional concept related to the symptoms and prognosis of cardiovascular disease. It plays a fundamental role in the quality of life of patients with cardiovascular disease, as it facilitates adherence to treatment, active engagement and is associated with better health outcomes, lower cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. It is determined by the characteristics of the individual, the severity of the cardiovascular disease, as well as the degree and type of social support provided by significant others.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Piperidi et al. (2022) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disease. Social support was evaluated on Quality of life. Social support plays a fundamental role in improving the quality of life, treatment adherence, and health outcomes of patients with cardiovascular disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: