Why the study?
Does a psychosocial intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy improve quality of life in patients with acute myocardial infarction and depression or low social support?
RCT (n=1,296)
randomized
Yes
Does a psychosocial intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy improve quality of life in patients with acute myocardial infarction and depression or low social support?
A psychosocial intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy provides modest improvements in mental quality of life and life satisfaction at 6 months in post-MI patients with depression or low social support.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports psychosocial care for post-MI QOL; leaves open effects on mortality or reinfarction.
In Brief PURPOSE: The Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease Patients (ENRICHD) clinical trial was designed to test whether intervening on depression or low perceived social support reduces mortality and reinfarction in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). This report analyzes the effect of the intervention on quality of life (QOL), which was an important secondary outcome. METHODS: ENRICHD was a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing a psychosocial intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy to usual medical care in 2,481 patients from 8 clinical centers. Patients with acute MI were included if they met criteria for depression, low perceived social support, or both. QOL was assessed at the 6-month clinic visit in the first 1,296 patients. QOL measures included the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form summary measures of physical functioning (SF12-PCS) and mental functioning (SF12-MCS), a Life Satisfaction Scale (LSS), and a measure of overall QOL based on the ladder of life (LOL) technique. RESULTS: There were significant treatment differences on the SF12-MCS (difference 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-3.2), the LSS (difference 1.0, 95% CI 0.5-1.5), and the LOL (difference 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.6), but not on the SF12-PCS (difference 0.8; 95% CI = −0.5-2.0). Effect sizes for the intervention on QOL outcomes were modest. CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial interventions of limited duration confer modest QOL benefits in post-MI patients who are depressed or have low perceived social support. Interventions of longer duration or greater intensity may be required to produce more substantial improvements in QOL in these patients. We analyzed the effect of a psychosocial intervention on quality of life outcomes in 1,296 patients with acute myocardial infarction who were depressed or had low social support, or both. Compared with usual care, the intervention was associated with modestly higher levels of quality of life after 6 months of treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leon et al. (2006) conducted an RCT in acute myocardial infarction with depression or low social support (n=1,296). Psychosocial intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy vs. Usual medical care was evaluated on Mental functioning (SF12-MCS) (difference 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-3.2).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: