Key result
Normothermic polarizing cardioplegia yields similar CK-MB release vs depolarizing cardioplegia but improves LV pressure.
Why the study?
Blood-based polarizing cardioplegia cardioprotection was previously found to be reduced during normothermic ischemia, prompting a comparison of crystalloid polarizing versus depolarizing cardioplegia.
Does normothermic crystalloid polarizing cardioplegia improve myocardial protection and hemodynamic recovery compared to depolarizing cardioplegia in a porcine cardiopulmonary bypass model?
Does normothermic crystalloid polarizing cardioplegia improve myocardial protection and hemodynamic recovery compared to depolarizing cardioplegia in a porcine cardiopulmonary bypass model?
In a porcine cardiopulmonary bypass model, normothermic crystalloid polarizing cardioplegia maintained similar levels of myocardial injury but significantly improved systolic and diastolic cardiac function compared to standard depolarizing cardioplegia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Animal data indicate possible functional gains without excess injury; leaves open translation to human bypass cardioprotection.
Background/Objectives: Previously, we showed that blood-based polarizing cardioplegia exerted beneficial cardioprotection during hypothermic ischemia; however, these positive effects of blood-based polarizing cardioplegia were reduced during normothermic ischemia compared to blood-based hyperkalemic (depolarizing) cardioplegia. This study compares crystalloid polarizing cardioplegia to crystalloid depolarizing cardioplegia in a normothermic porcine model of cardiopulmonary bypass; Methods: Twelve pigs were randomized to receive either normothermic polarizing (n = 7) or depolarizing (n = 5) crystalloid cardioplegia. After the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass, normothermic arrest (34 °C, 60 min) was followed by 60 min of on-pump and 90 min of off-pump reperfusion. Myocardial injury (arterial CK-MB), hemodynamic function, and the energy status of the hearts were measured; Results: The arterial release of CK-MB was comparable between groups (p = 0.78) during reperfusion. During 150 min of reperfusion, systolic left ventricular pressure (p = 0.01) and coronary flow (p = 0.009) were increased, and wedge pressure (p = 0.04) was decreased in the polarized group. Further hemodynamic parameters (cardiac output, stroke volume) and high-energy phosphate levels were similar between groups. The requirement for noradrenaline administration during reperfusion was significantly higher (p = 0.013) in the polarized group; Conclusions: Under normothermic conditions and despite a similar increase in levels of cardiac CK-MB, crystalloid polarizing cardioplegia protected systolic and diastolic cardiac function after 60 min of cardiac arrest. These results suggest beneficial effects for polarizing cardioplegia; clinical studies are required to confirm these effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santer et al. (2024) studied Cardiopulmonary bypass (cardiac arrest model) (n=12). Normothermic crystalloid polarizing cardioplegia vs. Crystalloid depolarizing cardioplegia (modified St Thomas' No. 2) was evaluated on Arterial release of CK-MB (marker of myocardial cell damage) during reperfusion (p=0.78). Normothermic crystalloid polarizing cardioplegia resulted in comparable arterial CK-MB release (p=0.78) but significantly improved systolic left ventricular pressure and coronary flow compared to depolarizing cardioplegia in a porcine model.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: