Key result
Adenosine-lidocaine-magnesium cardioplegia is linked to lower postoperative Hs-TnI leakage versus Buckberg.
Why the study?
Hyperkalaemic depolarized arrest has potassium-related cytotoxicity, while preclinical studies suggest polarized arrest offers better myocardial protection.
Does normokalaemic adenosine-lidocaine-magnesium (ALM) blood polarizing cardioplegia improve myocardial protection and hospital outcomes compared to hyperkalaemic blood Buckberg depolarizing cardioplegia in elective adult cardiac surgery?
Comparison
Normokalaemic ALM polarizing cardioplegia vs hyperkalaemic Buckberg depolarizing cardioplegia
Design
Observational propensity score-matched cohort study
Authors
Loading...
Should not yet change cardioplegia choice; leaves open whether randomized trials confirm myocardial protection with ALM.
Cohort (n=1,000)
Does normokalaemic adenosine-lidocaine-magnesium (ALM) blood polarizing cardioplegia improve myocardial protection and hospital outcomes compared to hyperkalaemic blood Buckberg depolarizing cardioplegia in elective adult cardiac surgery?
p-value: p=<0.001
ALM polarizing cardioplegia provides superior myocardial protection, evidenced by lower troponin release and reduced inotropic requirements, compared to Buckberg depolarizing cardioplegia in elective adult cardiac surgery, despite comparable short-term clinical outcomes.
Francica et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in elective routine adult cardiac surgery (n=1,000). normokalaemic adenosine-lidocaine-magnesium (ALM) blood polarizing cardioplegia vs. hyperkalaemic blood Buckberg depolarizing cardioplegia was evaluated on perioperative leakage of high-sensitivity troponin I (Hs-TnI) (p=<0.001). Adenosine-lidocaine-magnesium polarizing cardioplegia resulted in significantly lower postoperative high-sensitivity troponin I leakage (P<0.001) compared to Buckberg depolarizing cardioplegia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: