Key result
Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation is being evaluated against radiofrequency cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation in the CRAFT trial protocol to determine its superiority in preventing atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients with typical atrial flutter.
Why the study?
CTI ablation for typical AFL is associated with high rates of new-onset AF, but the role of cryoballoon PVI alone without CTI ablation in patients without prior AF documentation has not been studied.
Does cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation prevent recurrence of sustained symptomatic atrial arrhythmia compared to radiofrequency CTI ablation in patients with typical atrial flutter?
RCT (n=130)
Open-label with blinded assessment
1:1 block randomization
Yes
Does cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation prevent recurrence of sustained symptomatic atrial arrhythmia compared to radiofrequency CTI ablation in patients with typical atrial flutter?
This study protocol describes an RCT comparing a novel trigger-based strategy of cryoballoon PVI against the conventional substrate-based strategy of radiofrequency CTI ablation in patients with typical atrial flutter.
Does not change ablation practice for typical flutter; leaves open cryoballoon PVI superiority over CTI ablation.
PURPOSE: Treatment of typical atrial flutter (AFL) with cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation is associated with a high occurrence rate of new onset atrial fibrillation (AF) during follow-up. There are data to support the addition of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) to CTI ablation in patients with both AF and AFL, but the role of cryoballoon PVI only, with no CTI ablation, in AFL patients with no prior documentation of AF has not been studied. METHODS: CRAFT is an international, prospective, randomised, open with blinded assessment, multicentre superiority study comparing radiofrequency CTI ablation and cryoballoon PVI in patients with typical AFL. Participants with typical AFL are randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either treatment arm, with patients randomised to PVI not receiving CTI ablation. Post-procedural cardiac monitoring is performed using an implantable loop recorder. The primary endpoint is time to first recurrence of sustained symptomatic atrial arrhythmia. Key secondary endpoints include (1) total arrhythmia burden at 12 months, (2) time to first episode of AF lasting ≥ 2 min, (3) time to recurrence of AFL or AT and (4) procedural and fluoroscopy times. The primary safety endpoint is the composite of death, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, cardiac tamponade requiring drainage, atrio-oesophageal fistula, requirement for a permanent pacemaker, serious vascular complications requiring intervention or delaying discharge and persistent phrenic nerve palsy lasting > 24 h. CONCLUSION: This study compares the outcomes of 2 different approaches to typical AFL-the conventional 'substrate'-based strategy of radiofrequency CTI ablation versus a novel 'trigger'-based strategy of cryoballoon PVI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ( ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03401099 ).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Typical atrial flutter (n=130). Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation vs. Radiofrequency cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation was evaluated on Time to first recurrence of sustained (> 30 s) symptomatic atrial arrhythmia following a 4-week blanking period. Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation is being evaluated against radiofrequency cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation in the CRAFT trial protocol to determine its superiority in preventing atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients with typical atrial flutter.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: