Key result
A random forests classifier combining linear and nonlinear dynamical measures of RR intervals achieved positive predictive values of 97%, 98%, and 90% for detecting atrial fibrillation, normal sinus rhythm, and sinus rhythm with frequent ectopy, respectively.
Why the study?
Can nonlinear measures of RR interval time series improve the classification of atrial fibrillation, normal sinus rhythm, and sinus rhythm with frequent ectopy compared to linear measures alone?
Observational (n=2,722)
No
Can nonlinear measures of RR interval time series improve the classification of atrial fibrillation, normal sinus rhythm, and sinus rhythm with frequent ectopy compared to linear measures alone?
Nonlinear measures of RR interval time series can accurately distinguish atrial fibrillation from normal sinus rhythm and sinus rhythm with frequent ectopy, enabling reliable rhythm detection in noisy settings or personal monitoring devices.
Nonlinear RR measures may aid noisy AF detection; leaves open validation before clinical adoption.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is usually detected by inspection of the electrocardiogram waveform, a task made difficult when the signal is distorted by noise. The RR interval time series is more frequently available and accurate, yet linear and nonlinear time series analyses that detect highly varying and irregular AF are vulnerable to the common finding of frequent ectopy. We hypothesized that different nonlinear measures might capture characteristic features of AF, normal sinus rhythm (NSR), and sinus rhythm (SR) with frequent ectopy in ways that linear measures might not. To test this, we studied 2722 patients with 24 h ECG recordings in the University of Virginia Holter database. We found dynamical phenotypes for the three rhythm classifications. As expected, AF records had the highest variability and entropy, and NSR the lowest. SR with ectopy could be distinguished from AF, which had higher entropy, and from NSR, which had different fractal scaling, measured as higher detrended fluctuation analysis slope. With these dynamical phenotypes, we developed successful classification strategies, and the nonlinear measures improved on the use of mean and variability alone, even after adjusting for age. Final models using all variables had excellent performance, with positive predictive values for AF, NSR and SR with ectopy as high as 97, 98 and 90%, respectively. Since these classifiers can reliably detect rhythm changes utilizing segments as short as 10 min, we envision their application in noisy settings and in personal monitoring devices where only RR interval time series may be available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carrara et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Cardiac rhythm classification (Atrial Fibrillation, Normal Sinus Rhythm, Sinus Rhythm with ectopy) (n=2,722). Nonlinear dynamical measures (COSEn, LDs, DFA) combined with linear measures vs. Linear measures alone was evaluated on Positive predictive value for rhythm classification. A random forests classifier combining linear and nonlinear dynamical measures of RR intervals achieved positive predictive values of 97%, 98%, and 90% for detecting atrial fibrillation, normal sinus rhythm, and sinus rhythm with frequent ectopy, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: