Key result
CYP2C19-guided P2Y12 inhibitor selection was dominant compared to no testing, gaining 0.0027 QALYs and saving $527 per person over 12 months.
Why the study?
Although CYP2C19-guided P2Y12 inhibitor selection reduces CV events and bleeding post-PCI for ACS, its 12-month cost-effectiveness from the VHA perspective had not been evaluated.
Does CYP2C19-guided P2Y12 inhibitor selection improve cost-effectiveness compared to no testing in Veterans post-ACS/PCI?
Does CYP2C19-guided P2Y12 inhibitor selection improve cost-effectiveness compared to no testing in Veterans post-ACS/PCI?
Effect estimate: dominant (0.0027 QALYs gained, $527 saved/person)
CYP2C19-guided P2Y12 inhibitor selection is a cost-effective and high-value strategy that improves cardiovascular outcomes and lowers costs in Veterans post-ACS/PCI.
CYP2C19 testing appears cost-effective; leaves open whether prospective trials support routine adoption post-PCI.
AIMS: CYP2C19-guided P2Y12 inhibitor selection can reduce cardiovascular (CV) events and bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The 12-month cost-effectiveness of CYP2C19-guided P2Y12 inhibitor selection for Veterans post-ACS/PCI was evaluated from the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA) perspective. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using average annualized PCI volumes and P2Y12 inhibitor use from VA data, a decision-analytic model simulated CYP2C19 testing vs. no testing outcomes in 2800 hypothetical Veterans receiving PY212 inhibitor for 12 months post-ACS/PCI (74% clopidogrel, 5% prasugrel, and 21% ticagrelor use at baseline without testing). CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) carrier prevalence was 28%. Model inputs were from studies (bleeding/ischaemic events, CYP2C19-guided therapy effect, health state utilities, CYP2C19 LOF carrier prevalence) and VHA administrative data (costs of events, drugs, CYP2C19 testing; PCI volumes, and P2Y12 inhibitor prescriptions). The primary outcome was cost (2020 US\}$) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Base-case scenarios, probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and scenario analyses were completed. CYP2C19-guided therapy resulted in 496 (24%) escalations (clopidogrel to prasugrel/ticagrelor) and 465 (65%) de-escalations (prasugrel/ticagrelor to clopidogrel). CYP2C19 testing averted 1 stroke, 27 myocardial infarctions, 8 CV-related deaths, and caused 3 bleeds. CYP2C19 testing (vs. no testing) was dominant in the base-case scenario (0.0027 QALYs gained, \}$527 saved/person) and in 97.1% of simulations, making it cost-effective and high-value. In scenario analyses, de-escalation in conjunction with escalation is required for CYP2C19 testing to be cost-effective and high-value. CONCLUSION: In Veterans post-ACS/PCI, CYP2C19-guided P2Y12 inhibitor selection can improve CV outcomes and lower costs for the VHA within 12 months of implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2022) studied acute coronary syndromes post-percutaneous coronary intervention (n=2,800). CYP2C19-guided P2Y12 inhibitor selection vs. no testing was evaluated on cost (2020 US$) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained (dominant (0.0027 QALYs gained, $527 saved/person)). CYP2C19-guided P2Y12 inhibitor selection was dominant compared to no testing, gaining 0.0027 QALYs and saving $527 per person over 12 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: